A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 08:40 on September 9, 2016, the Defendant driven a two-lane freight vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.179%, and led the D company in front of the D company located in the south-gu C at the port of port at the port of port along three-lane roads from the port of port of port of port to the large diving distance.

At all times, there was a signal-based vehicle in front, so there was a duty of care to ensure the safety distance to prevent any collision with the vehicle driving service provider and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded without looking well at the front, and led the victim E, who was in the same lane, to drive the F rocketing car, which is owned by the victim E, in the same lane, to have the part concerning the panion in front of the cargo vehicle. Moreover, the Defendant got the victim G, who was in the atmosphere of the above signal, to have the victim G, who was in the top of the signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, even though he did not destroy the rocketing car equivalent to KRW 2,083,871 for repair costs by occupational negligence as seen above, and did not immediately stop the Hare car to the extent that it would amount to KRW 627,922 for repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E and G ( driver involved in each traffic accident);

1. Corresponding inquiries;

1. Written estimate for vehicle repair;

1. A traffic accident actual condition survey report, accident site photograph;

1. Notification of the results of the crackdown on drunk driving, the report on the circumstance of a drunk driver, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the investigation report (related to the application of the Tramark

1. Relevant provisions of Articles 148, 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of running sound); and

1. As to the crimes of violation of each Road Traffic Act due to the measures not taken after an accident, Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act, the crimes against victims E, which are more severe.