logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016.3.24.선고 2016도644 판결
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(뇌물)·(예비적죄명:뇌물수수)
Cases

2016Do644 Violation of the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes Act (Bribery)

(Preliminary Crime: Acceptance of Bribe)

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Law Firm B

Attorney C, D, and E

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2015No1799 Decided December 24, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

March 24, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable to have determined that the lower court convicted of violating the Act on Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes Aggravated Punishment, Etc. (Bribery) due to KRW 100 million among the primary facts charged of the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Park Poe-young

Justices Park Byung-hee

Justices Kim Gin-

Justices Kwon Soon-il

arrow