Text
1. The elected in an election of non-standing directors held by Defendant B agricultural cooperatives on November 13, 2014, against Defendant C.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. In the course of the merger with Defendant AF and DF (hereinafter “Defendant AF”) on February 24, 2006, Defendant AFF entered into a merger with DFF (hereinafter “DF”), Defendant AF would continue to exist, and DF would be dissolved. After the merger, Defendant AF would have one standing president, one standing director, one non-standing director, one non-standing director, and one non-standing auditor as executive officers of Defendant AF, and the non-standing director 11 agreed to elect from Defendant AF members of the agricultural community as three members of the 7th, DF and one non-standing member of the Defendant AF, who is not a member of the agricultural community.
(hereinafter “instant director allocation agreement”). B.
On October 24, 2014, Defendant No. 3 enacted the bylaws of the Provisional Council of Representatives of Nonghyup Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant bylaws”) with the content that the 10 of Defendant No. 3 will elect three of the 11 non-standing directors in the Defendant No. 3 area prior to the merger, Defendant No. 3, in accordance with the instant director allocation agreement, the following was enacted:
C. On November 1, 2014, the chairperson of the election management of Defendant C’s non-standing director and the Plaintiff’s non-standing director-standing director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general- director-general-general- director-general-general- director-general-general-general- director-general-general (hereinafter “instant election”). Defendant C
The plaintiff was a member of the agricultural cooperative district as a member of the agricultural cooperative district in this case and was successful.
The relevant provisions are as shown in the articles of association of local agricultural cooperatives.
[Reasons for Recognition] Nos. 1 to 4, 7, 9
2. Determination as to the defendants' defense prior to the merits
A. As to the assertion of Defendant Nonghyup Election Commission’s election commission, Defendant Nonghyup Election Commission’s decision is merely a body dealing with the affairs related to the election of Defendant Nonghyup, and is a body.