logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.17 2014누62533
임용취소처분 취소청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following matters to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

(1) In Part IV, the following shall be added to "an unlawful disposition" in Part IV.

In addition, even though there were cases of special employment without open employment in the past, the disposition of this case goes against the principle of equality and the principle of proportionality as it applied different standards in the same case.

"Violation of the principle of equality and the principle of proportionality"

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow