logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.19 2015나58937
보험금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following, thereby citing this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Following the first instance court's decision No. 7 of the 7th instance court's decision "the matter provided for in paragraph 11 of the 7th instance court's decision," by distinguishing the payment of the death benefit due to a disaster and the death benefit due to a cause other than a disaster, and adding "the matter with suicide exemption and restriction provisions"

On the 7th judgment of the first instance court, “this case” is added to “this case’s main contract and the instant special agreement are different insurance organizations.”

3. If so, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow