(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.10.19 2018고단381

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.10.19 2018고단381

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2017, at around 10:30, the Defendant, at around 10:30, sustained a victim D (84 taxes) who is a member of the company with disabilities who can be seen as the chairperson, and caused the damage to the victim by misunderstanding that the telephone line connected to the office installed by the victim was a multi-line seal installed by the victim, and caused the victim to go beyond the upper upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part, which requires treatment for about 90 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statements of E;

1. Legal statement of F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A criminal investigation report (to hear a record file of a suspect's currency);

1. A copy of a medical certificate of injury, medical certificate, and medical treatment;

1. Recording-recording files CDs of the victim's own telephone;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as field photographing photographs;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the Defendant of the choice of imprisonment, and defense counsel

1. The gist of the allegation is that the Defendant was the victim’s grandchildren to defend the victim from the attack, and there was no intention to inflict an injury on the victim.

2. The following circumstances revealed by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined at the trial at the judgment party: (i) the victim is a senior citizen of 84 years of age who gets on and moves the front wheelchairs at the time of the instant crime; (ii) the victim could have sufficiently predicted that, in the event that another person is pushed with the victim, the victim would have a high possibility of suffering an injury because of the victim's booming on the ground; and (iii) the victim attempted to attack the defendant as alleged by the defendant; and (iv) the witness E rather than the witness E at the time of the instant crime:

Filty.

참조조문

-형법 제257조 제1항

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2017.06.26 2017고합45

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.05.26 2017고정344

-서울동부지방법원 2017.12.21 2017고합276

-서울남부지방법원 2016.05.26 2015고정2018

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2017.01.13 2016고단222