logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.24 2016고단4216
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 3, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on April 3, 2007, and a summary order of KRW 3,50,000 for the same crime at the same court on June 4, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Despite the fact that the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act two or more times as above, the Defendant driven a BF car under the influence of alcohol content 0.260% from the section of approximately 700 meters of alcohol to the road near the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “Dombromb market” on August 24, 2016, while driving a BF car under the influence of alcohol content 0.260% from the section of approximately 700 meters to the road front of the same room.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving B Kanche 2 passenger vehicles.

The Defendant, as mentioned in the above paragraph (1), driven the above van while under the influence of alcohol with 0.260% of the blood alcohol concentration, and driven the three-lane in front of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along the one-lane from the side of the Sungwon apartment distance to the bachelor’s distance, and proceeded by changing the two-lane to the two-lane.

In such a case, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering system, brakes, etc. of other vehicles, as well as to prevent accidents, by properly examining the front, rear, and left and right of the direction that the driver intends to change the lanes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to change the two lanes, was driven by the victim D (the age of 68) who was driving by the victim D(the age of 68) due to the negligence of changing the two lanes, received the front part of the EF company bus in front of the above passenger bus driven by the Defendant, and led the victim G (the age of 63) who stopped on the three-lane, so that the above bus can be pushed by the shocking part.

arrow