logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.11.13 2014고단885
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the defendant are those engaged in the driving of BKan-2 automobiles;

On May 2, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car at around 17:20, and driven the said car along the two-lanes from the Gidong Elementary School to the middle distance from the side of the Gidong Road, along the two-lanes.

In such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to ensure the distance to avoid the collision by maintaining the distance between the vehicle and the vehicle in front, and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to report the suspension of DK5 vehicles driven by the victim C(50 years old) who was driving ahead of it, and received the Defendant’s vehicle behind the said K5 vehicle in front part of the Defendant’s vehicle. due to its shock, the said K5 vehicle was pushed forward in the future, and the victim E(38 years old) was able to have a part behind the FNF Engine vehicle driven by the victim E(38 years old), and the said NFI or other vehicles were pushed back in the future, and caused the victim to spread the part behind the HK 2 vehicle driven by the victim G.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the above victim C, the above victim E, the victim I (year 13), and the victim J (year 13) in the above K5 vehicles, respectively, on the part of the victim, and at the same time, damaged the above 5 vehicles to cover KRW 2,120,828 in repair cost, with approximately KRW 2,837,00 in repair cost to cover KRW 2,837,00 in repair cost, respectively. The above 2 HFK vehicle was destroyed to cover approximately KRW 250,00 in repair cost.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as described in paragraph 1, operated the said B Kani 2 car without mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow