2016dridum20400 Action to confirm the existence of de facto marital relations

A person shall be appointed.

Yangsan City

Attorney Lee Do-young

Prosecutor of Busan District Prosecutor

1. A;

2. B

Busan address of the Intervenor

Attorney Lee In-bok et al., Counsel for supplementary intervenors

March 23, 2017

June 22, 2017

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by each person, including the costs incurred by the participation in the lawsuit.

It is confirmed that a de facto marital relationship existed between the Plaintiff and the deceased Eul (referring to the place of registration: the time of leisure: the time of leisure) from August 2012 to March 15, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 5, 1985, the Plaintiff, after reporting the marriage with the non-party deceased Kim 00 on September 5, 1985, was married with two children under the chain, and the deceased on March 31, 1998.

B. On September 6, 1990, the deceased Eul (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") reported a marriage with Non-party Kim *** on the part of the defendant’s assistant intervenor, and made a marriage with the defendant’s assistant intervenor on the part of the defendant, and entered into a divorce with Kim * on February 24, 2003.

C. On March 15, 2016: around 00, the Deceased fell from 16th floor while working as a new construction site of 00 Busan Southern-gu and sent back to the hospital on the same day, but died at around 19:25 on the same day.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2-3, Gap evidence Nos. 5-1 and 2-2, the whole pleadings

Purport

2. The plaintiff's assertion

The Plaintiff shall marry with the deceased from August 2012 to March 15, 2016, as the deceased’s intention to marry from March 15, 2016.

In order to claim that a de facto marital relationship was in a de facto marital relationship living together with the substance of life, it is sought to confirm the existence of the de facto marital relationship in this case for the survivors' benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act and the survivors' pension under the National Pension Act.

3. Determination

A. Relevant legal principles

De facto marriage refers to a marital relationship between the parties, which is not recognized as a legally married couple, because they did not report their marriage as a formal requirement. Therefore, the mere fact that a person has a simple living or a sporadic family relationship in order to receive protection equivalent to a legal marriage as a de facto marriage is insufficient, and there should be a subjective agreement between the parties, and objectively, there should exist social facts that can be recognized as a marital community in terms of social order in terms of social norms, and the social legitimacy should also also be maintained.

B. Determination

갑 제8호증 , 갑 제10 내지 12호증 , 갑 제18호증의 각 기재와 갑 제6호증의 1 내 지 11 , 갑 제14호증의 각 일부 기재 , 갑 제4호증의 1 내지 14 , 갑 제15호증의 각 영상 에 변론 전체의 취지를 보태어 보면 , 원고가 망인 생전에 망인과 함께 여수 * * 도에 있 는 망인의 어머니 댁에 몇 차례 방문하거나 여행한 적이 있고 , 망인의 사후 망인의 아 버지 제사에 참석하기 위해 여수 * * 도에 가기도 한 적이 있는 사실 , 원고는 또한 망인 과 함께 망인의 형제자매나 망인의 친구들과 여러 차례 어울려 식사 등도 함께 한 사 실 , 망인 명의로 2015 . 8 . 26 . 경 * * 화재해상보험 주식회사와 체결된 내생애든든종합보 험계약 상의 만기보험수익자가 원고로 되어 있고 , 위 보험증권 ( 보험가입증서 ) 상 계약자 인 망인의 주소가 원고가 운영하던 미용실 주소로 기재된 사실 , 또한 망인 명의로 2015 . 12 . 30 . 경 * * 화재해상보험 주식회사와 체결된 무배당프로미라이프 내생애첫건강 보험1509 ( 실비보험 ) 의 보험증권 ( 보험가입증서 ) 상에 계약자인 망인의 주소 역시 원고가 운영하던 미용실 주소로 기재된 사실 , 원고 명의의 각 부산은행 계좌 ( 계좌번호 : : 112 - * * * * - 6517 - * * * , 갑 제12호증 , 계좌번호 : 112 - * * * * - 0767 - * * * , 갑 제18호증 , 이하 ' 이 사건 각 부산은행 계좌 ' 라 한다 ) 의 각 거래내역에는 2012 . 8 . 경부터 망인의 급여가 원고 명의의 이 사건 각 부산은행 계좌로 입금되고 , 2015 . 2 . 26 . 경부터는 이 사건 각 부산은행 계좌 중 전자의 계좌에서 수시로 망인에게 기십만원씩 이체되기도 한 사실 , 망인의 형제자매들과 원고의 지인 등이 원고와 망인이 사실혼관계에 있었다는 취지의 사실확인서를 작성해 준 사실을 인정할 수 있다 .

However, in light of the following circumstances, Gap evidence No. 10, Eul evidence No. 12, Eul evidence No. 5, and No. 6, the Plaintiff’s overall purport of the deceased’s change in the deceased’s statements, and the Plaintiff did not write down his marriage consciousness with the deceased at least fluorial or funeral, and the second floor of the Busan Jin-gu building’s second floor that was living together with the deceased, could not be seen as an inappropriate place for the Plaintiff to take advantage of their respective circumstances such as the Plaintiff’s 2m width and 4m of length, and that it was difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s separate account no more than 6m of the deceased’s family members to take advantage of their respective circumstances, such as the Plaintiff’s non-life-friendly relationship between the deceased and the Plaintiff’s family members.

4. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Park Sang-sung