logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.08.31 2018노1
특수협박
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact-misunderstanding 1) At the time of the instant case, the Defendants were only eight persons, while the other party was more than 80 persons. Defendant B, at the time of the instant case, did not know about the contents contained in the Pats disease in an emergency situation where more than 80 employees of the service company continued to enter and leave for compulsory removal, and did not go back to the hats and did not immediately go on the floor of the Pats, knowing that the contents were gasoline.

Defendant

A In the process, the number of employees of organized violent service workers coming to Defendant A with a stringing to Defendant A, and the number of strings exceeds the above strings, and the strings only string the strings into the floor and sound the strings with a stringer in his own defense level, and the actual strings were not attached to the stringer.

As such, the Defendants did not have any intention to make any special intimidation.

2) The time when Defendant A her brick and bricker, which Defendant A b bricked the gasoline contained in the paint, has no particular relationship with time and place far far away from the Defendant’s bricking act.

On the contrary, the service employees did not feel fear at all, such as attempting and baling the Defendants at the time.

Defendant

B는 페트병에 담긴 내용물이 휘발유라는 것을 알고 위협행위로 나아가지 않았고, 피고인 A는 라이터를 들 기만 하였을 뿐이고 실제 불을 켜거나 불을 켜는 시늉조차 하지 않았다.

Therefore, at the time of the instant case, there was little possibility that the fire would pose a threat to the life or body of the service employees, and the actual service employees did not feel fear.

3) The Defendants, as soon as they were in the instant case, committed G’s business at the time of the instant case, and did not know the fact that there was no conspiracy to commit the crime in advance, and there was no knowledge that there was each other at the time of the instant case.

B. Legal doctrine is erroneous and compulsory execution at the time of the instant case.

arrow