logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.12.01 2020고단3713
사기미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"200 Highest 3713"

1. A thief, around 16:19 on May 18, 2020, the Defendant stolen goods worth approximately KRW 2,84,800,00 in total nine times in total, from that time until June 27, 2020, including: (a) the Defendant: (b) discovered the E-witter vehicle in the market price owned by the victim D (owner) who was parked in the said place with a key affixed to the vehicle on the street located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (c) opened the top door of the vehicle that was not corrected; and (d) carried the vehicle into the front door of the vehicle; and (d) cut off the goods with a total of KRW 2,84,800,00 in the market price owned by the victim D (owner).

2. On May 18, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) without obtaining a driver’s license, and around 16:19 on May 18, 2020, the Defendant driven the E-Poter Cargo at a section of about 3.5 km from the front side of C in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the Yeongdeungpo-dong 2, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the Young-gu,

3. At around 18:00 on June 26, 2020, the Defendant acquired the victim F on the street prior to the construction site in the vicinity of the Obridge in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, e.g., the victim F on the street, which was owned by the Defendant.

The Defendant, as above, did not take necessary procedures, such as taking the above physical card out and returning it to the victim, and did so on his own idea.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

4. The Defendant attempted to commit fraud, around June 27, 2020, at the H Hospital Emergency room located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the settlement of KRW 16,400 for medical expenses, and the Defendant attempted to use the F Bank Track Card by deceiving the employees by presenting the F Bank Track Card, which was possessed as described in the foregoing paragraph 3, to the employees of the hospital as Defendant himself/herself, and did not intend to use the F Bank Track Card. However, the Defendant did not intend to refuse the approval due to a report on the suspension of use of F’s card.

arrow