logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.12.24 2015고단3244
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 2, 2015, around September 14:38, 2015, the Defendant, around September 14:38, 2015, took up approximately two minutes of the Defendant’s gallon’s galthical film board of the subway No. 8, the subway No. 997, as the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance, in which the Defendant was placed in the front part of the victim’s bridge and the west jum in the front part of the Defendant’s Samsung Talthro, where the Defendant was placed in the front part of the victim’s bridge, and the galthro, which was located in the front part of the Defendant’s Samsung Talthro, with the video photographing function of the A7 mobile phone type.

As a result, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using a camera or other similar mechanism.

2. On September 2, 2015, around September 15, 2015, the Defendant, around September 15:27, 2015, recorded approximately three minutes of the video recording function of the cellular phone equipment as indicated in paragraph (1), where the victim’s bridge and the stoke mar were put in front, and the Defendant took a picture on September 15:27, 2015, on the screen platform of subway No. 8 in subway No. 305, the Songpa-gu Seoul Olympic Games, with a short red stoke, after the victim’s name cannot be known.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using the camera or other similar devices.

3. On September 2, 2015, around September 16, 2015, the Defendant, on September 16:02, 2015, recorded approximately five minutes of the video recording function of the cellular phone equipment as described in paragraph (1), where the victim’s bridge and spathm were put in front of the front part of the front part of the front part, and the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front part of the front

Accordingly, the defendant is a carmera or other machinery with similar functions.

arrow