The appeal by the plaintiff (appointed party) is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff (appointed party) and the annexed list of the appointed parties.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is to delete the part of the 3th judgment of the court of first instance, 16th through 21th judgment, and the plaintiff's assertion in this court is identical to the reasoning of the first judgment, except for the judgment as to the plaintiff's assertion as to the following 2th judgment, and therefore, it is to accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion in this court

A. Whether there was a resolution of the board of representatives of the reconstruction association as to whether the present floor and the middle floor of the living room constructed in the apartment of this case constitutes a defect in the construction work [the plaintiff's assertion] The plaintiff did not have a resolution to change the present floor from the natural representative seat to the artificial representative seat, not installing a heavy door between the living room and the front floor, and to change the living room floor floor from the natural floor into the front floor. Accordingly, unlike the original project proposal, it is argued that it is a defect in the construction work that the present floor was constructed as a artificial representative, and the front door was not installed between the living room and the front door. The defendant's final completion of the apartment of this case was not installed in the front floor of this case 8, 9, 10, and 11. The defendant's final completion of the apartment of this case, which was submitted to the reconstruction association of this case on March 14, 2005, and the final completion of the apartment of this case's reconstruction association of this case.