logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.30 2013나32795
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are the same as the judgment of the first instance except for the following additional judgments, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional judgment: Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 4, testimony at the court of first instance and the trial of the witness E, and the whole purport of the plaintiff's testimony at the court's examination of the plaintiff himself; i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged: ① D (hereinafter referred to as "higher") cut off the left-hand side due to caturology, etc. at the time of the accident, but the upper body was hard to move because the wheeler was able to move, ② there was no obstacle at the time of the accident; ② even if it is difficult for the deceased to move, there was no particular obstacle to communication; ③ it was no problem to view the plaintiff's wheel in the ward at the time of the accident, ③ it was hard to see that the plaintiff was the front body of the accident or the body of the plaintiff, without any particular obstacle to the plaintiff's request, and the plaintiff was made to open the wheeler in the ward or the body of this case.

3. The conclusion of the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and thus, the Plaintiff.

arrow