logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.11.07 2018고단857
지방재정법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From March 25, 2004 to September 13, 2017, A is the chapter chairperson of the branch of the branch of the branch of the D (hereinafter referred to as the "branch of the D branch of the D branch of the D branch (hereinafter referred to as the "branch of the D branch") before the C organization, E (the suspension of indictment on the same day) is the branch chairperson of the D branch from September 14, 2017 to the present day, and Defendant B is the person who works as executive secretary of the D branch from August 30, 201 to the present day, and the D branch is a local assistant who is a veterans-related organization authorized by the head of the State veterans branch of the D branch, and is a local assistant who receives local subsidies from D viewing.

A local subsidy program operator shall faithfully perform a local subsidy program with the care of a good manager in accordance with statutes, the details of the decision to grant local subsidies, or the disposition by the head of a local government under statutes, and shall not use the relevant local subsidy for any other

Nevertheless, when the office operating expenses are insufficient, the Defendants were willing to use the local subsidy from D viewing for other purposes, and to forge the evidentiary documents.

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and Defendant B

A. 1) Violation of the Local Finance Act 1) Defendants using subsidies for non-purpose purposes shall be held nine times a year in total at the branch office of the above D Si Council located in F around October 2012.

D Then, from February 2013 to November 2013, total of KRW 9,100,000 as the term “G operational subsidies” was received, and in fact, the remainder of KRW 6,020,000 was paid three times from January 2013 to December 2013 as office operating expenses, such as first-aid vehicle maintenance expenses, insurance premium, communication expenses, Defendant B’s retirement reserve fund, etc., and used KRW 21,790,000 in total seven times from the above date to December 2017 as the office operating expenses, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to use G operational subsidies and H subsidies received from D viewing for other than the prescribed purpose.

2) The term “ Onnuri gift certificates” refers to ...

arrow