beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2015 Highest 134] The Defendant is a person who served as an employee at the E main office located in Gu/Si, Si, Gu, Si, Do, operated by C from July 2011 to June 2013.
On June 14, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had F, who had engaged in the business with the above C and would operate the said head office, worked in the above head office; (b) had retired from the said head office; and (c) on July 2013 and August 2013, the Defendant was written between customers on the above head office, but did not work in the said head office.
Nevertheless, for the purpose of having C criminal punishment, the Defendant stated on May 20, 2014 that “A,” and “C,” the labor inspector at the Daegu Regional Employment and Labor Agency’s Office and the office located in the Gu-U.S. Regional Employment and Labor Agency (U.S.) Dong-dong 92-31 as the petitioner’s form of a petition, and stated “7,8 months’ wages and retirement allowances” as the petitioner’s annual statement, and submitted to the labor inspector a written petition in the column for summary of the petition, “wages” and retirement allowances” and submitted the written petition to the labor inspector at the same place on June 9, 2014, and submitted it to the labor inspector at the same time and place on July 250, 2013, and did not receive KRW 2,77,419,00,000,000,0000 from the respondent, “I will not receive the above amount of retirement allowances” and “I will receive the labor inspector’s paid” as the petitioner’s final statement.
Accordingly, the defendant was dismissed for the purpose of having C be subject to criminal punishment.
[2015 Highest 240] The Defendant stated the facts charged in the indictment in the case of the Gu, Si, Gu, Si, Gu, and Si, but it appears to be a clerical error in the case of Gu, Gu, Si, Do, D, and the Defendant argued this part of the charges, thereby exercising the Defendant’s right of defense.