The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error and inappropriate sentencing)

A. Error of facts: (a) the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license from the Defendant’s office to the D restaurant, driven the otob, but he was towed by the otoba without driving the drinking at D restaurant from the D restaurant to the obaba; and (b) he was led by the oba while he was towed by the oba, the oba, along with the oba.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found all the charges against the defendant guilty is erroneous in misconception of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence (5 million won of fine) imposed on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court may recognize the fact that the Defendant driven a motorcycle without obtaining a motorcycle driver’s license under the influence of alcohol, as shown in the facts charged.

The defendant's above assertion of mistake is not accepted.

1. On August 30, 2014, at around 20:16, the Defendant was found to have been used together with oba in front of the flusium at the entrance of the Hanjin-gu, Hanjin-gu, Songjin-do.

The defendant argued that he did not drive Orala or Oralba while drinking in D cafeterias, and that he led Oralba while under the influence of alcohol and lost his memory.

The defendant's assertion that Oraba, which had normally worked from the defendant's office to D cafeteria, failed to work in the D cafeteria, is difficult to easily believe, and there is also no evidence to recognize that Orababa has broken down.

In addition, it is reasonable to keep the non- packing gate, which is the place where the defendant asserts that the defendant is leading the Oral gate, from the front of the excavation bridge discovered by the defendant.