logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.11.28 2014고단1606
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of one hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of Daelimtete 125cc c. without a number plate, and the above Oral Ba that is not covered by mandatory insurance shall not be operated on the road.

Nevertheless, at around 08:40 on October 4, 2014, the Defendant operated the above Obane which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the front road of the Cheongbago, which is located in the Gu of Daegu-Sagu, Cheongbari.

2. On October 4, 2014, at around 08:40, the Defendant driven a lux road from the front of the lux road of the Bluxa-gun, Daegu-gu, Singu, Singu, Singu, to the front road of the luxa-si, Singu, Singu, Singu, Singu, on the 350-meter section, without obtaining a driver’s license, on the luxa-do without a license.

3. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (AFS) The Defendant is a driver of Daelimte 125cc Oral lebane without a license plate.

Around 09:00 on October 4, 2014, the Defendant was driving the above Oral Ba, and was driving on the road of four lanes in front of the Cheongdo-ri, Daegu-gu, Singu, Singu, Singu, Sindo-si, at a speed of about 30km from the 2nd industrial complex surface to the 30km of Sindo-si, the Defendant left the road at a speed of about 30km from the 2nd to the 3rd industrial complex surface. On the other hand, the Defendant's collision with Dcodididi of the victim C (V, 69 years old) who changed the two lanes to three lanes from the 2nd way to the 3rd way. At the same time, the victim suffered an injury, such as the completion of the 8-day medical treatment, and the above Cordiba-si was damaged to the extent of damage of the 568,000 won, and the victim was leaving the road with the above Cordi, and did not interfere with the traffic of each road.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement 1.

arrow