1. The appeal by the defendant (appointed party) is dismissed;

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant (appointed party).

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that the defendant (appointed party)'s assertion is not sufficient to recognize the facts of the defendant's assertion as additional evidence submitted at the court of first instance. The "2008 general meeting" in the 7th court's 12 and 13th court's 7th 7th 7th 12 and 13th 2008 is the same as the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification to the "special general meeting of 2008", and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's respective claims of this case are justified, and the decision of the court of first instance is just, and thus, the appeal by the defendant (appointed party) is dismissed as it is without merit. However, since it is obvious that the "the termination of title trust" under Paragraph 1 of the decision of the court of first instance is a clerical error in the "the termination of title trust", it is so decided as per Disposition.