logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.10.14 2015나21075
손해배상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. Of the disposition of the first instance court, “1.” in paragraph (1) of the same Article.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this court should explain are as follows: “G” No. 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed as “D”; “each description of evidence No. 20 or 36 of the judgment of the court of first instance (including each number)” shall be added to evidence sufficient to admit the Plaintiff’s assertion in Chapter No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance; thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As such, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, on the ground that it is apparent that “the date of November 21, 201” in paragraph (1) of the judgment of the court of first instance is a clerical error in the text “ December 21, 201.

arrow