logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.07.22 2020노536
사기
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant had the ability to perform the duties of authorization and permission for horse riding practice courses and tourist farm development projects, and faithfully performed the duties of service. However, in the case of the projects to create horse riding practice centers, the projects were born out due to the false or diving of G, and in the case of the projects to create the tourist farm, only the projects were performed without the victim’s timely payment of part payments.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which convicted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the original judgment and the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the original judgment, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by comprehensively taking account of the evidence presented in the judgment of the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the lower court can sufficiently recognize that the Defendant, as recorded in the instant facts charged, deceiving the victim and acquired money.

Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of mistake is without merit. (A) The Defendant asserts that the development project of the riding course development project (AL) was unsatisfying due to G’s unsatisfying without finishing the issues related to civil petitions. However, in relation to the circumstance where the Defendant excluded G and directly promoted the project of the creation of the riding course with the victim, the victim of the Do governor, who was the victim of the Do governor, was entrusted by the court below with the Defendant’s operation of the G and the Defendant’s operation of the Do governor. The victim of the Do governor, who was the victim of the Do governor, stated that “I would like to go through the process of the Defendant’s examination” in the court below, “I would like to go through the Defendant’s operation of the Do governor’s operation of the Do governor’s operation of the Do governor.” The Defendant’s defense counsel at the trial court

arrow