1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B’s local government is a local government that ordered “L business” (hereinafter “instant business”) with the content that K is to be established with H creation, I creation, J and urban planning roads in G, and Defendant C, D, E, and F are public officials belonging to the Defendant B’s local government, and Defendant gardening Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant gardening Engineering”) is a company that concluded a shop design service contract with Defendant B’s local government and performed shop design services.

The Plaintiff is employed by the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “M”) that entered into a construction project management service contract with Defendant B-government, and served as the chief supervisor of the Construction Project Bureau (the Supervisory Board) in the instant project site.

B. On November 28, 2014, Defendant B concluded the instant project shop design service agreement with Defendant A, setting the contract amount of KRW 156,212,00, and the service period from December 4, 2014 to May 2, 2015, on which the project shop design of the instant case was awarded to Defendant A Military Engineering, and the Defendant A Military Engineering submitted the shop design report to Defendant B, pursuant to the said contract.

C. On November 14, 2016, Defendant B concluded a service contract for construction project management of the instant project with the content that the contract amount is 600,589,000 won with M, Dae Engineering Co., Ltd, and the Korea Electrical Design and Supervision Technology Foundation, and the service period is 600,589,000 won from November 14, 2016 to December 8, 2017; and the Plaintiff, an employee of M, participated in the performance of the said service as the supervisor of the Construction Business Bureau (the supervisor).

On March 29, 2017, when the Plaintiff was performing the above service, the Plaintiff’s unfair treatment and disposal of the company, and the company’s work site (including the current site and the current site N on the one’s own mistake) and the ordering office.