The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the storage of food for sale after the summary of the grounds for appeal, the defendant did not keep the products for sale purposes, but did not keep the products for which the distribution period of this case elapsed for the purpose of sale, but temporarily stored to identify the cause of return, etc., and as to the violation of the indication criteria, the violation of the indication criteria is limited to the difference of the Stick labels attached to some products by dampers that occur while the kimchi products are bleep in the warehouse, and the products in leep as in this case are in the manufacturing and processing process. Thus, it does not constitute the "products for sale" under Article 10 (2) of the Food Sanitation Act or "products for import, display, transport or business use."

Nevertheless, the lower court found Defendant guilty of each of the charges of this case, which erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The court below rejected the above assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion identical to the grounds for appeal of this case, and under the title "the judgment of the defendant and defense counsel's assertion" in the judgment of the court below, the court below rejected the above assertion by giving a detailed statement about the defendant's and defense counsel's assertion. In light of the above judgment of the court below with records, the judgment of the court below is just and it is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.