A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:30 on June 11, 2016, on the ground that the victim B, who was a female living together, had a wind with another male, the injured defendant found the victim's residence in North-gu C at port, and took off the victim's head debt at hand and towed the victim's head debt at his/her seat, led the victim's head debt at his/her seat, and caused the victim to face with the victim's head on the wall of the corridor for about 2 weeks, the injured defendant saw the victim's two-day medical care in light of the victim's head.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by tearing 3 punishment and 2 punishment in the winter, in which the market price on the victim’s own cannot be known, using the bags located in the main place at the above time and at the above time, and destroying the property by gathering one and a large amount of 1 cremation with which the market price cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds of suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the following conditions of sentencing shall be determined in full view of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant does not have the same force and other criminal punishment in addition to fines in 1983 and 198, and the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim, in addition to those fines in 1983 and 1998.