beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) In 2012, Plaintiff A and Defendant C were dynamics in the third grade 9 of J Middle School, and Plaintiff A, Defendant C, F, and G are concurrently engaged in a private teaching institute operated by Plaintiff B. 2) Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, Defendant D and E are the parents of Defendant C, Defendant H and I are the parents of Defendant F and G.
B. Around July 2012, Plaintiff B reported that the said Defendants exercised school violence by causing harassment to Plaintiff A. On December 4, 2012, 2012, the J Middle School, which was accompanied by Defendant C, and the K Middle School, which was accompanied by Defendant F, and G. The J Middle School took measures to participate in written apology and counseling programs against Plaintiff A and Defendant C with respect to bullying and harassment, and on December 13, 2012, K Middle School rejected the Plaintiff’s insult and intimidation against Defendant F and G on December 13, 2012, without suspicion that it is difficult to recognize the Plaintiff’s insult and intimidation against the Plaintiff. Accordingly, upon Plaintiff’s application for reexamination to the Local Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence, the Chairperson of the Local Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence, who was Chungcheongnam-do, dismissed the Plaintiff’s written request and disposition against the Plaintiff on April 25, 2013, and dismissed the Plaintiff’s indictment against Defendant CF through examination by each investigation agency, and notified Defendant CF.
In addition, on March 22, 2013 and December 13, 2013, the court rendered a decision of non-examination decision and non-disposition against Defendant G.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 (including branch numbers in the case of provisional number), Eul evidence Nos. 1-1, 10, 11, Eul evidence Nos. 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12
2. The plaintiffs' assertion
A. From February 2012 to June 2012, Defendant C had the Plaintiff undergo the examination of Plaintiff A and B at a school and a private teaching institute, and the Plaintiff.