logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.09.21 2018나104199
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The parties 1) The Plaintiff is the Ftel on the ground of the Seo-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu and one parcel (total of 70 households; hereinafter “the instant officetel”).

(2) The co-defendant C of the first instance trial, who is the owner and the rental business operator, is the Plaintiff’s husband, and the Defendant C of the first instance trial, engaged in the housing management business under the name of H, while receiving the management fee of KRW 35,000 per month from the occupants of the instant officetels from March 201 to March 2014, and performing the duties, such as the payment of household appliances AS, electricity, and the cleaning of buildings in each unit room.

3) From February 26, 2011 to February 25, 2012, and from April 6, 2011 to April 5, 2012, Defendant D Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) entered into each mutual aid agreement (hereinafter “instant mutual aid agreement”) with 10,00,000 won each of the mutual aid agreements (hereinafter “the instant mutual aid agreement”). The Plaintiff and Lessee entered into each of the following lease agreements with 0-30-10-631-61-61-61-201-61-201-61-201-30-61-61-201-20-30-61-201-20-61-201-20-61-201-20-301-61, respectively, on the following subject matters in the instant officetel (hereinafter “each of the instant lease agreements”).

(3) The lessee of this case had not been granted such authority by the Plaintiff. (3) The lessee of this case against the Plaintiff.

arrow