A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, damage to the negligent property is caused by occupational negligence.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On October 14, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of a deadly weapon, etc.) at the Daejeon District Court on March 14, 2009; on August 11, 2010, the Daejeon District Court sentenced the Defendant to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny; on December 6, 2010, the said judgment became final and conclusive by the withdrawal of appeal; and on June 23, 2012, the execution of the said sentence was completed.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 04:00 on July 19, 2012, the Defendant driven a C multilateral vehicle without a driver’s license in the distance unclaimed section from the front day of the mutually unclaimed packing end in the Jung-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, Daejeon, to the front day of the road, at around 05:50 on the same day.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a tea in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (AD) and the Road Traffic Act (AD).

Around 05:50 on July 19, 2012, the Defendant driven the said car and proceeded at a speed of two lanes in front of the Sungnam-dong, Daejeon-dong, Sungnam-dong, by one-lane from SamsungN-dong to Sungnam-do.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to operate the steering gear and brakes accurately and to see well the right and the right and the right of the steering system in order to operate the vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to set up a balke and stopped in the front bank due to negligence, and received the part of the victim D(32 years old) driving E, E, E, E, E, E, E, E, 35 vehicles, and the part of the calp vehicle behind the said calp vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence for approximately two weeks to the victim.