The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below found the defendant guilty of the defamation of this case, although the injured party of the ground of appeal proved that he was in bad faith with her husband, who was convicted of consolation money of KRW 15 million by her husband's in bad faith. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant is aware of the victim’s her husband and her husband in the same year during which he/she was found in the office of building management in Busan-si where the injured party worked as the managing director on May 22, 2013 and his/her employees such as accounting staff are heard.

A photograph and a tape recording has been made in this year.

p) The tax base of the taxable year is not to be added to the taxable year.

The contact with the representative meeting of the representative meeting shall be able to keep the width only.

It can be sufficiently recognized that the honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out the fact with the large interest of the victim.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.