1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 203,341,879; (b) KRW 2,50,000; and (c) each of them on September 13, 2013.

1. Determination as to the existence of facts of recognition and liability for damages

A. The facts of recognition are the parents of Plaintiff B and Plaintiff C, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the owner of D tourist buses.

On September 13, 2013, the driver E of the above tourist bus driven the above bus at around 04:37, and driven the two-lanes at a point 320 km away from the parallel of the expressway in the Yan-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si (hereinafter referred to as the "WG") and concealed the two-ton cargo vehicle from the central separation zone and the five-ton cargo vehicle prior to the expressway by the shocking.

The bus driver E, who is the bus driver at the time, neglected the operation of the preceding vehicle while driving it safely, and caused the above accident.

As a result, the plaintiff A, who was on board the above tourist bus, suffered from the injury of the plaintiff A, such as the 4th century emissions, the upper part of the upper part of the bar, the upper part of the first part of the left part of the water, the left part, and the tear of the two parts.

Plaintiff

A was hospitalized from September 13, 2013 to March 31, 2014 after the above accident, and was hospitalized from March 31, 2014, and was hospitalized in spine 3 to March 31, 2014, and had 29% permanent disability in spine as well as 29% permanent disability in spine after the fixed beverage, and the face left 6cm x 0.6 cm in straight straight line and 8 cm in verte portion.

Plaintiff

In the face of A, the 6 cmly chrode viral anti-mymmetrics of 6 cms generated in this part are somewhat hicking, but the plezzle in the eye is permanently left.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 4-1, 2, Gap evidence 5-1, 2, Gap evidence 7-1 through 11, Gap evidence 8-1 through 3, Gap evidence 10-1, 10-4, and Gap evidence 10-1 through 4, the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the annexed hospital of the YY, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The bus driver E who suffered the liability for damages.