logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.08.21 2018고단1248
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2, 2017, the Defendant stated that he/she would operate the LAB, and that, around February 1, 2017, the Defendant would compel the victim E to remove and replace the 1st floor of the FJcheon Factory Office, the first floor of the FJcheon Factory Office, and the 2nd floor inside the 2nd floor of the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, the Cheongcheon-si, the Cheongcheon-si, the

However, even if the Defendant received the construction cost from the victim, the Defendant merely thought that the Defendant would pay the Defendant’s employees’ benefits and other construction costs, etc., and at the time, other construction costs have been paid in the same time by a “comparing” method. Therefore, even if the Defendant received the construction cost from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to perform the said construction work.

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 68 million from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Dispute Resolution BankB.

2. On February 10, 2017, the Defendant, on February 7, 2017, made a false statement that “The Defendant would lend the funds for the operation of the company to the victim E in the Geumcheon-dong, Yongsan-gu, a considerable amount of money for the construction of the company if the funds for the operation of the company are needed. Unless otherwise, the Defendant would exceed the cream bank operated by the company.”

However, the above GPC is operated by the Defendant’s pro-friendly H, and there was no disposition authority for the Defendant, and the above B’s operation at the time did not have the intent or ability to repay the above money even if it borrowed the above money from the Defendant due to the lack of financial status to the extent that the monthly rent would not be paid.

Around February 10, 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 63 million from the victim, to the account of H’s community credit cooperatives under the name of H.A.

3. On May 16, 2017, the Defendant of fraud, around May 16, 2017, deposited KRW 30 million with the victim E, including interest KRW 2 million after 12 days, if he/she lends additional KRW 28 million to the victim E.

arrow