logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.08.20 2019고단4812
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2019 Man-Ma4812" is a man who is employed by B and works for the defendant, and the victim C is a person who entrusts B with the 45 million won of Gangwon-do D detached Housing construction around November 2016.

On January 1, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C by telephone at the “F office” office of the operation of the “F” office located in Dongbcheon-si, Dongbcheon-si, B, the Defendant concluded that the payment of construction cost would have been made if the payment of construction cost is made.

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he will receive construction cost from the victim for personal purposes, and did not have the intention or ability to proceed with the completion of the house as agreed.

Around January 6, 2017, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 700,000 from the victim as the payment for construction work, under the name of the Defendant’s name, and received KRW 10,140,000 as the payment for construction work by 19 times in total from May 23, 2017, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

The defendant of the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Apartment H is a person who has implemented a remodeling project for the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Apartment H, and the victim I is a human resources supplier.

1. On October 16, 2018, the defrauded requested the provision of human resources by stating that “The victim is conducting remodeling works, and if the human resources are supplied first, he/she would immediately pay the cost of construction when he/she receives the cost of construction.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was issued 12 million won of the construction cost by J, the contractor of the above construction, and it was thought that the above payment was used for the purpose of personal debt repayment, etc., so there was no intention or ability to pay the wages to the victim.

The Defendant, from the victim on October 16, 2018, shall belong to the Defendant.

arrow