logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2020.04.09 2019고정917
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim B are marital relations.

1. Around 18:00 on May 12, 2019, the injured Defendant suffered injury in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as the victim’s escape from his/her gathering place, satis, satis, the victim’s breath with breath, and her hand, and walking the body breath of the victim’s body with his/her satch, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, satis, and satis, and satis, etc.

2. At around 09:40 on July 14, 2019, the Defendant injured the Defendant by assault and injury: (a) on the ground that on the grounds that the Defendant visited the house and visited the house again, and (b) on the ground that he visited the house again, the Defendant suffered from the injury requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as the son’s arms and knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife, knife, knife, knife, knife, and knife, knife, knife, knife and knife, the part of which is in detail known, the knife, the knife’s knife’

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the family relation certificate, on-site photograph, each injury diagnosis certificate, recording book, and statutes governing damaged photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Articles 262, 260 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury caused by violence), the selection of fines for negligence;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts that the illegality of the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which, around July 14, 2019, brought the victim into the apartment C (hereinafter “instant apartment”) around July 14, 2019, is excluded as self-defense or legitimate act to cope with the victim’s intrusion upon his/her residence or refusal to leave.

arrow