Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Criminal facts

1. 모욕 피고인은 2015. 10. 10. 01:25경 파주시 D에 있는 E이 운영하는 ‘F’이라는 상호의 주점에서 술값을 지불하지 않고 있다는 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 파주경찰서 G지구대 소속 피해자 경위 H과 피해자 순경 I에게 위 업소 업주 E과 종업원들이 있는 가운데, “야 임마. 야 십쌔끼들아 너희들이 뭔데 그래”라고 욕설하여 공연히 모욕하였다.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 제1항 기재 일시경 파주시 J에 있는 파주경찰서 G지구대에서 위와 같은 사실로 현행범인 체포되어 대기석에 앉아 있다가, 순경 I가 자신의 앞에서 다른 신병관리대상자에게 수갑을 채우려고 하자, 아무런 이유 없이 갑자기 발로 I의 엉덩이 부위를 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in the course of performing duties such as the management of a new disease in the earth.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Each complaint filed by H and I;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (as to the confirmation of CCTV inside the G District);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case committed against police officers who take a desire or assault to maintain the reason and social order of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and to protect the public safety, but the nature of the crime is not good. However, it seems that the method of obstructing the performance of official duties, the degree of obstructing the performance of official duties resulting therefrom, etc. are not much serious, and there is no history of punishment exceeding a fine until now, and it is contingent.