Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a customer of the DNA beauty room in Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, and the victim E (39 years, women) and the victim F (22 years, women) are the operators and employees of the above beauty art room.

1. On October 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) the victim E, the owner of which is a victim of the DNA beauty shop located in Seongdong-gu, Sungwon-si; (b) around October 14:00, 2015;

9. 7. Although the Defendant demanded the payment of expenses for non-payment of the expenses after the head chropsing, the Defendant’s motive and the victim demanded that “I will interfere with the business of the customer, because he will be scambling, scambling, scambling,” the Defendant obstructed the beauty room business by force, such as preventing one male customer in the beauty room and one female customer who was in the beauty room from working for about 40 minutes.

2. Violence;

A. On October 2, 2015, at around 14:30 on October 2, 2015, the Defendant demanded the victim E to leave the beauty room in the place indicated in paragraph (1). The Defendant used the victim’s bath, such as “maar the same year and the same year as a fraudulent change,” and used the victim’s arms and stuffs once.

B. When the victim F who received a police report from E at the time, time, and place mentioned in the above paragraph A, attempted to report to 112, the Defendant assaulted the above victim’s hand by hand, and assaulted the victim’s hand by hand at a time.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the fourth public trial date);

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Each investigation report and reports on occurrence of violence, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the ct v course photographs and a statement of 112 Reporting Processing Cases

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires repayment of the credit value.