Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 20, 2016, Defendant B, at F located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, on August 20, 2016, the Defendant strongly resisted against the dangerous attitudes of the Defendant G (22 years old) of the victim G (22 years old) who was the other party to the livestock game operating the livestock game, and caused injury to the victim, such as the injury of the victim’s face, and the injury of the 14-day character of the oral and oral surgery, which requires treatment for about 14 days, by taking one time into consideration the dangerous attitudes of the Defendant.

2. Defendant A, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), as seen above, had a fluence between the victim and his wife B, and had the victim's coco part, and had the victim suffered injury, such as the victim's 14-day medical treatment, and the injury of the victim, such as the injury of the fluence and the injury of the fluence of the fluence, the injury of the fluence, the bru

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Photographss, diagnostic records, CCTV CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Articles 257(1) and 263 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: Articles 257(1) and 263 of the Criminal Act; and the choice of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the issue of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) (hereinafter “Defendant B”) and their defense counsel asserted that although Defendant B was involved in the victim’s contact for defense, there was no injury by taking the victim’s face at one time as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case.

On the other hand, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by this Court as being comprehensively taken into account the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, i.e., the victim respondeded to Defendant B’s dangerous attitude while carrying out a stable game, and Defendant A was faced with a drinking face.

Last, Defendant B, who had been sentenced to imprisonment at the time, stated that it was said that he had been sentenced to imprisonment, and that it was in this court.