The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of grounds for appeal;

(a) World Trade Organization (hereinafter referred to as the “FH”);

Since C's house gate was opened, and it did not enter the door, it does not constitute a crime of intrusion on residence.

B. In relation to the crime of defamation, the phrase “C this F and G 20,000 won was called “F and G 20,000 won,” but C actually made such a speech, and the phrase “C was sold by mixing with the government when rice was stored.” However, there was no fact that “the 7,00,000 won per Gyeongno membership fee was embezzled” was read as “the 7,00,000 won was embezzled.”

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the Defendant led to the confession of all the charges of this case, including the crime of defamation in the court of the court below, ② the Defendant opened a gate in the first floor and opened a gate after going to the third floor through stairs in order to go to the house of the third floor among the third floor multi-households. In light of the structure, if the Defendant comes to go against the intention of C, the space from the gate to the third floor door in front of the gate and the third floor door can also be seen as the object of intrusion. ③ The Defendant was investigated by the husband in the case in which the Defendant filed a complaint against her husband, and went to the house of C to resist this. The Defendant did not open the gate, and the Defendant did not come to the 3 minutes above, and the Defendant did not come to the 30th floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor, and the Defendant did not come to the 30th floor of the 3rd floor of the 3rd floor.