beta
Text
1. Of the plaintiffs' lawsuits in this case, the part of the plaintiffs' lawsuit against defendant Il New Steel Co., Ltd. is dismissed.
2. Air conditioners;
Reasons
Basic Facts
A Twcon Co., Ltd (formerly: A Twcon Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Awcon”) organized a joint supply and demand organization (hereinafter “instant joint supply and demand organization”) with the plaintiffs from the Jeonju City to receive the project for the establishment of the Southern Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant construction”). The Awcons were delegated by the plaintiffs as the representative of the joint supply and demand organization, as the representative of the said joint supply and demand organization, the right to manage property such as a claim for payment, and the right to receive the construction cost.
The Jeonju-si requested the Korea Government Procurement Service to conclude the instant construction contract, and on November 14, 2003, the Korea Government Procurement Service entered into a contract for the instant construction project with the joint contractors of this case.
Since then, joint contractors and joint contractors of this case had changed contracts several times, and the construction of this case was completed on April 29, 2013, which was the final completion date of the construction, and the Jeonju City paid all the final contract amount to the joint contractors of this case on April 2013.
On September 30, 2015, Aststrug filed a lawsuit against the Jeonju-si claiming indirect construction costs incurred due to delay of construction (hereinafter “related lawsuit”), and the Jeonju District Court rendered a judgment on November 16, 2016 that “the Jeonju-si shall pay Astrug additional indirect costs of KRW 288,67,000 and its delay damages to Astrug”.
Accordingly, on August 31, 2017, the Jeonju-si Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court 2016Na12781) rendered a judgment to the effect that the part of the above amount was reduced on August 31, 2017, and that “the Jeonju-si shall pay an additional indirect cost of 230,941,600 won and its delay damages,” and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
(hereinafter referred to as the “instant additional indirect cost claim”). However, the Defendants are the obligor’s claims for the attachment and attachment of the claims against the prior owner in accordance with the aforementioned judgment.