logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.16 2017나2017939
부동산소유권확인 등
Text

1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant shall set forth the order Nos. 1 through 4, 7 through 21, 23.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this judgment is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a partial different conclusion, thereby citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The plaintiff, at the second Tenth of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be referred to as "the defendant".

(b) Decision of the first instance; and

The main part of this paragraph shall be filled by the following:

1) For each product listed in Attachment 3, there must be relations which shall contribute to the common use of the principal product. Here, it shall contribute to the common use of the principal product.

State property means an act of making the State property to fulfill its economic utility, not an accessory, even if it is offered to the owner or user of the State property or an article not directly related to its own utility;

(2) In light of the above legal principles, each of the items stated in the evidence Nos. 31, 33, and 66, as stated in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 4, 7 through 21, 23 through 40, 42 through 45, 48, 49, as stated in the separate sheet Nos. 3, 1 through 4, 23 through 41, 23 through 40, 42 through 45, 48, and 49, as stated in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 4, 7 through 21, 23 through 40, 23 through 40, 42 through 45, 48, and 49, shall be deemed to have the utility of each of the above items, even if each of the items was directly provided to the owner of each of the above real estate, it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff acquired ownership from the former owner of the instant vehicle.

Therefore, each of the articles listed in the Nos. 1 through 46, 48, and 49 in the [Attachment 3] are listed in the instant case.

arrow