Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for ten months, and for four million won, each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine.

Defendant

B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A on September 11, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution on August 8, 2012 to the crime of leakage of secrets for official duties, etc., and the above judgment was finalized on January 8, 2013. On May 2, 2012, the Defendant C was sentenced to three years of suspension of execution on September 27, 2012 by imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on May 2, 2012.

1. On December 13, 201, Defendant A was prosecuted for the crime of leakage of official secrets at the Gwangju District Court’s office, etc., and was transferred to the Seoul Southern District Court for trial proceedings. The content of the indictment was that “The Defendant, despite having inquired about I’s multiple times, was informed to I and was not arrested.”

The Defendant: (a) discovered that the Defendant was a designated recipient and discovered that he was a designated recipient and did not arrest him intentionally; (b) asked B slope, which was before the Seoul Southern District Court located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul District Court, to the effect that “When he appeared and testified as a witness in a trial, he asked B to the effect that “When he appeared and testified as a witness, I would like to clearly indicate that he would not arrest I because the actual form of I, which was identified as a designated recipient and was in the office, is different from one another; and (c) thereby, I would like to have asked B to testify to the effect that he would not arrest I.

The above facts revealed that the Defendant and himself were aware of the receipt of I at the time. However, at the court of Seoul Southern District Court No. 306, Jun. 8, 2012, 2012, the Defendant testified false facts to the effect that “The Defendant was present as a witness of the Defendant’s case, such as the divulgence of official secrets against Defendant A, the above court No. 2012 Godan919 of the above Seoul Southern District Court, and testified to the effect that “I’s inquiry pictures and the actual form are not arrested because they did not know that they were different,”

In this respect, the Defendant instigated the above perjury.