1. As to an accident described in the attached Form, Article 2(2) of the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s liability for damages against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 7, 2014, at the C Diplomatic Office operated by the Defendant in the Seo-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the facility and the house in the said Diplomatic Office by fire at around 3:10, and then destroyed the entrance door.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

As a result of the police's fire site identification, it appears that the whole pattern was burnedd on the floor surface above the ceiling book. On the back of the above classroom, the electric winder installed on the upper part of the wall surface (HEFW-2200; hereinafter referred to as "the instant hot winder") destroyed by fire, heat, and modified, and the shape was laid down on the interior board in favor of the steel and glass. The above hot winder was seriously damaged by fire and heat and modified. The upper part of the right side where the electric winder was installed was the same as other electric products installed inside the above classroom, and the electric winder installed on the wall of the above classroom installed on the front wall of the above classroom, and thus, the police presumed the electric winder of this case as an emission point because the heat and heat generated by electrical cause was not identified.

C. In addition, as a result of the appraisal by the National Scientific Investigative Institute, it appears that the concentration was found in the upper cable immediately above the global cable as a result of the appraisal by the National Investigative Institute, it was presumed that the said researcher was caused by the interruption and damage of the electric wires inside the said global climate. D.

The plaintiff is a manufacturer of the hot wind of this case.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, 11, 12, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the fact inquiry results against the National Scientific Investigation Institute, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's liability for damages against the defendant is established

A. According to the above facts of recognition, it is reasonable to view that the accident of this case occurred in the hot wind of this case. The plaintiff does not have any defect in the hot wind of this case, and therefore, the defendant is the defendant due to the accident of this case.