This case shall not be under the jurisdiction of the court.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a director of C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) for the purpose of industrial plant business, etc. in Yong-Namnam Cancer B.

After concluding a contract for the supply of goods to the filling pumps (the removal of the anti-nets of the reactor coolant system and the maintenance of a certain body) at the D nuclear power plant construction site operated by Hanwon with the Korea Water-Power and Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Korea Water-Powering Power Co., Ltd.”), the Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Korea Water-Power”) entered into a contract for the supply of goods for the maintenance parts (the function of removing the anti-nets of the reactor coolant system and maintaining a certain body), the Defendant requested the Defendant to issue the inspection certificate along with the purchase of the

Accordingly, the Defendant had tried to arbitrarily revise the contents of the above inspection certificate in accordance with the purchase specifications of Korea-U.S., and, even if the above inspection certificate was issued, to obtain the sales proceeds by submitting it as normally issued.

Around December 2012, the Defendant altered private document: (a) in C office with a view to exercising the right without authority; (b) converted the certificate of inspection into JPG file; and (c) modified one copy of the certificate of inspection issued by Heat 1213549, in the mechanical characteristics of the certificate of inspection (Heat 1213549) by means of revising the number of the certificate of inspection using the computer program-to-site; (d) “37129,256” in the column of seal robbery; and (e) “46702” in the seal robbery column; and (e) “31” in the annual rate; and (e) modified one copy of the certificate of inspection under the name of Sastccoco., a private document concerning the certificate of inspection.

B. Around December 2012, the Defendant used the altered private document that was issued as if the altered inspection certificate was a document duly formed, and issued as if it were a document duly formed, at the e-mail office located in the e-mail office located in 41 (Yandong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, by delivering “Rounddododoar and exchange seal” to an employee who was unaware of such fact.

C. The Defendant was guilty on December 2012.