logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2013.06.18 2013고정294
폭행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 09:50 on January 7, 2013, the Defendant sought that the victim E (the age of 29) was not tightly in the D-4 corridor located in Chuncheon-si, Chuncheon-si, and assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s desire to “I am about why you want to do, why you want to do so, what I want to do, what I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am am I am I am I am I am I am

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. A report on the field of violence;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the case

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. At the time of the instant case, the Defendant asserted that: (a) at the time of the instant case, the Victim E, having the head of the Defendant’s head, having the face of the Defendant’s hand-to-to-kh; (b) took a hand-to-keep and walking the side of the bridge, and, (c) took the face of the victim’s head and taken the face by hand, was merely taken in the face of the victim’s hand-to-kh; (d) the victim’s face was either taken in the face of the victim’s face by drinking, or walked with the face with the hand-to-kh; and (e) even if not, the Defendant’s act does not constitute self-defense, as it is intended to defend the life and body of the Defendant from the assault of the victim, and thus does not constitute self-defense.

2. According to the evidence in the summary column of the evidence prior to the determination, it is recognized that the Defendant, who did not pay monthly rent, was at the time of leaving the victim's head when the Defendant attempted to flee, and the victim's face was taken twice, and the victim's face was taken twice in drinking, and the victim’s head was satisfy and walked at several times.

arrow