logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.02.02 2016고단8936
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business affairs at the Seoul Central District Court on July 22, 2016. On May 14, 2015, the enforcement of the said sentence was terminated at the Seoul Western District Court. On December 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business affairs at the Seoul Western District Court and completed the enforcement of the said sentence at the Ansan Prison on December 22, 2015.

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On October 3, 2016, from around 12:00 to 13:40 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) at the D restaurant operated by the injured party C in Gangnam-gu Seoul on the same day; and (b) without any other reason, for customers during drinking alcohol, the Defendant “Woo hackh hackh hackh hackh hackh hackh hackh hack

Doese Doese Doese Doese

“In doing so, it interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 1 hour and 40 minutes, such as avoiding disturbance, leading customers to go with the disturbance, etc.

B. On October 10, 2016, from around 01:50 to around 02:50, the Defendant expressed in F cafeteria managed by the victim E in Gangnam-gu, and expressed to the customer and the above cafeteria employees of the customer and the above cafeteria employees who were next to the customer while drinking alcohol, without any other reason, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about one hour by avoiding disturbance.

2. The Defendant: (a) received the payment of the purchase price by multiplying the victim, inasmuch as he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the purchase price even if he/she received alcohol and food from the victim E; and (b) received the payment of the purchase price by approximately KRW 32,00,000 by the order of the purchase of the purchase of the purchase price by

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Each statement prepared by C, G, and E;

1. A receipt and a list of reported cases;

1. An investigation report (No. 9 of the evidence list);

1. A written inquiry about criminal history;

1. Current status of personal expropriation;

1. Application of each of the statutes governing the judgment;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (a) and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (a) (abscisonation of property, acquisition of property) for criminal facts and selection of punishment.

arrow