logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.05.02 2018누64674
추가상이처 인정거부처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in the trial while filing an appeal for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the contents alleged by the plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the plaintiff's claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the court of first instance are

The reasons for this case are as follows: "No evidence exists" in the three pages 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance with "No evidence"; "No evidence" in the six pages 3, 4, 6, and 13 of the judgment "No evidence" [No evidence 13 of the judgment submitted by the plaintiff to this court is stated in "the name of the disease" in "the name of the hospital" as "the identification identification pathromatic proof room of the disease"; "the content of treatment and opinions on future treatment" in the "the name of the patient" in the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance from the second half of the judgment to the right office of the court of first instance to the second half of the treatment from February 27, 2014 to the second half of the judgment from February 27, 2014 to the second half of the judgment of the court of second half of the judgment, and there is no additional reason for the plaintiff's failure to observe the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance to the right 6dB, and the left 30, etc.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow