logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.06.15 2016나15301
약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the modification of five parts of the first instance judgment as follows. As such, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The "Witness" of the 6th parallel, 16th parallel, and 8th parallel shall be the "Witness of the First Instance".

(b) under paragraph 6(g)(i)(i), under paragraph 3, paragraph 4(i)(i)(i)(i)(i)(i)(i)(j), under paragraph 4(i)(i)(i)(s)(i)(s)(i)(s)(s)(i)(s)(i)(s)(iii)(h)(i)(i)(i)(s)(i)(i

(c)the succession to “F” in Chapter 4 is due to the succession to “C”;

under paragraph 4 below the 5th day.

The term "unuse materials" as referred to in the part of the paragraph shall be regarded as "unuse equipment and materials".

(e)from 7 pages “However,” to 5:00 to 5:00,000;

However, considering the following circumstances, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff and Defendant B agreed to receive the rent of the instant commercial building from the Plaintiff, Defendant B, and the network C, by taking into account the aforementioned circumstances that can be comprehensively acknowledged.

① From November 208 to February 24, 2009, Defendant B shared the expenses, etc. incurred while residing in Defendant B’s house from October 21, 2009 to December 31, 2009.

② Although the Plaintiff received KRW 3,00,000 from Defendant B around January 2010, the Plaintiff asserts that Defendant B arbitrarily used the Plaintiff’s money to repay the Plaintiff’s loan to the Plaintiff’s Nuniversity entrance registration around February 2009, and that the Plaintiff collected money from Defendant B.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff paid money to Defendant B for the purpose of repayment of the above loan around February 2009, and that Defendant B arbitrarily used the money.

③ On the contrary, A.

arrow