The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is an employee of a restaurant B, who works for the restaurant B.

On October 10, 2014, around 00:30 on October 10, 2014, the Defendant committed assault against the victim, i.e., the victim’s right part less than twice the right part of the victim’s right part at the back of the cab seat, while taking the time expenses, such as the victim’s frighting to be the guest of D-si operated by the victim C (the victim of 59 years of age), to be the victim of D-si, to be the victim of D-si’s wrong identification of the destination, and to exchange and take other baths.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

(c) Expression of intention not to punish: Agreement submitted on April 15, 2015, which was after the institution of public prosecution of this case.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.