logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.08.29 2013고단1341
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(State) On August 16, 201, the Defendant’s husband D, the representative director of C, died on August 16, 201, who was the Defendant’s husband D, and was dissatisfied with the management of the Company’s funds by the Defendant E, the inside director of the said Company, who was the representative director of C, who was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s complaint.

On November 30, 2011, the Defendant did not have been delegated to withdraw the company deposit from E, a representative of the said company, around November 30, 201.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On November 30, 201, the Defendant stated “F”, “F”, “F0,000,000 won (10,630,000)”, and “C” in the deposit owner column, on the paper of written request for deposits kept at the Busan City Party-dong, 311-21 located at the Busan Party-dong, Seo-gu, Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, by means of an official approval color pen, and affixed D’s seal, the former representative director of the said company, who did not obtain the above E’s approval.

B. At around 10:10 on the same day, the Defendant entered “F” amount in the account number column of the bank claim form in the same manner as “F” and “C of a stock company” in the deposit account form, and posted the said D’s seal next thereto.

C. At around 14:30 on December 7, 201, the Defendant had G enter “F”, “F million won (17,000,000),” and “D of the depository company in the column of deposit notes” in the same manner at the same place, and affixed the seal attached thereto.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged three copies of the deposit claim under the name of the State C, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. The defendant 1-B

H, a bank employee, at the same time and place as described in the subsection, who is aware of the forgery, above 1-A.

paragraphs 1 and 2.

As described in the paragraph, two copies of the forged deposit claim were delivered as if they were duly formed and used.

B. The defendant 1-C above.

as described in paragraph (1).

arrow