logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.12.21 2017고정1757
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the crime of giving a bribe at the Daegu District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 10, 2017.

On February 28, 2017, the Defendant was present at the court of Daegu District Court No. 21, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, Daegu, 364, as a witness of the Defendant’s case, including the above court’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bribery) against C, 2016 High Court No. 537, 537.

The Defendant’s question, “(CA) at the D office to cancel the site for a stop of 5 to 6 months, and talk to the effect that the Council may cancel the site upon entering and leaving the agenda.”

“I, in relation to the Council, have made a statement “(C)”, and, in relation to the Assembly, have fluenced any fluent flag.

‘The Council’’’’’’s question “I were the E-Same, and the author did not have any knowledge about C Hanmadi.

“......... ② The counsel’s “.................................................................

The question “I have the right to ask.”

(3) The witness of the prosecutor’s “I cannot deliver 50 million won in return for the cancellation of the designation of the apartment stop site to C members at the early stage.”

G. G. G. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.

“The statement was made”.

However, in fact, there was no fact that the Defendant had heard from D’s cause C about the cancellation of the designation of a stop site and the statement related to the processing thereof at the Council. Since cash 50 million won delivered by the Defendant to C was a bribe paid under the pretext of the cancellation of the designation of a stop site, the Defendant stated that “CA lending 50 million won to E” was “.” and there was no fact.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copies of the second trial records and the examination of witnesses; and

arrow