logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.08.10 2016고정785
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 13, 2016, around 14:30, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 5, Seoul Eastern District Court No. 404, Gasan-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant was notified of the right to refuse to testify.

Defendant 3 to the presiding judge of the Appellate Division of the above Court in the hearing of the above case “Abrupt that the Defendant had expressed his desire to Defendant D.

“I shall be asked to the counsel’s question.”

“Adora witness was fluored to the effect that “The degree of five to seven minutes in dispute has continued to exist, and he was satisfing with one another in a large sense,” and if so, the Defendant was fluored only by “I ambling the evidence” without having any desire to the victim.

“I have become aware of the public prosecutor’s question.”

“Other witnesses, other than the witness, were fluent with the purport that the Defendant d’s Defendant d’ was friended to the effect that the Defendant d’s Dominian Domin Domin Domin Domin. The Defendant said d’s Domin Domin Domin Domin Do, and the witness said Domin Domin Domin.

The prosecutor’s question, “D C was reported by C, and C, I became aware of the Doar’s “Doar” as D.

‘Evidence of evidence’ and his sound only;

The testimony was made to the effect that C, such as “,” had not expressed D the intent to “dominate Dominia”.

However, on August 30, 2014, at around 18:00 on August 30, 2014, the Defendant observed the entire voice of C in the Handong-ro apartment playground in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, as “Doar Youth.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Copies of each protocol of examination of witness, and copies of each record;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (a copy of the judgment of the E perjury case and the details of the case of the court, a copy of the judgment of the C insult case, and the details of cases

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and the choice of punishment.

arrow