A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person operating “E” and “F” and “G”, a business entity that sells miscellaneous goods, such as completes and drones, in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, which is a business entity importing miscellaneous goods, etc.

1. When the Defendant, while importing and selling drones, etc. which did not undergo conformity assessment from China, had the business operator name of the above “F” appear to have H make a false statement as if it was an actual operator, and had H be relieved of criminal punishment.

Accordingly, the Defendant, around the early August 2015, at the above “E” store, presented “E” to H as if he was present at the Seoul Radio Waves Control Office and was investigated as if he actually operated F. It would be paid in lieu of a fine.

“At the end, H had H make a false statement as if he operated the said company, and H had H attend the Guro-gu Seoul Radio Waves Control Office 22 Dao-ro Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, and made a false statement to I by “I import goods which did not undergo conformity assessment while operating the F.” around August 8, 2015.”

2. Any person who intends to manufacture, sell or import broadcasting and communications equipment, or machinery and materials which obstruct electromagnetic waves or are affected by electromagnetic waves, shall undergo conformity assessment of the relevant equipment and materials;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collusion with J on September 7, 2015, from around July 27, 2016 to around July 27, 2016, sold a total of 53,760 drones products, including F183 Models, to many unspecified customers who visited the store including K, etc. at the said E store, including K, etc., on a total of 7,772 occasions, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table of Crimes (a total of KRW 1,285,403,128).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H by each prosecutor's office;

1. Each protocol concerning the suspect examination of the police against J, L, M, N, K,O, P, Q, R, T, or U;

1. V.